Telling your story to immigration

By Jessica Suotmaa 0

Storytelling might not be the first thing that comes to mind when planning your immigrant or non immigrant benefit application or petition, but it is worth considering.  The United States Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) forms request a great number of facts while leaving little room for explanation. As such, many self-applicants may believe they should summarize their story into a short “blurb”.  We’re here to tell you this is not the case.

Regardless whether you’re trying to immigrate through family or asylum, petitioning for benefits based on hardship, or if you’re seeking nonimmigrant status via employment or investment, you should share your story.  Many of our clients submitted short summaries at the beginning, expecting the chance to expand and share their narrative later at the interview—only to find the interview is based on what was submitted. The interviewer will question new information that was not initially submitted as it suggests that you fabricated additional details to your story. This may not be true, but it’s cause for suspicion.

On the opposite spectrum, you have applicants and petitions who provide too much information, drowning the reviewing officer in data and evidence. How much time do you think a USCIS employee has to review and adjudicate on your application? It’s probably less than you’d think. Hence our suggestion to submit organized and clear submission packages. Not only is there limited time to review your submission, but it might be reviewed by several people, to varying extents.  Without a clear link, or narrative, to string your evidence together, your submission can be confusing at best; overwhelming at worst.

What immigration attorneys and paralegals do for you is they listen to understand your story, apply it to USCIS standards, request relevant evidence, draft your narrative for you, and organize the evidence to match your story.  The result is a clear and persuasive essay.  You can request to review this essay prior to submission, but it will become the “cover sheet” the attorney puts on his letterhead for your submission package. The coversheet is like the table of contents and introduction to your request, and is especially influential in long, complex cases, where the officer will exercise discretion.

If you’re not sure how your narrative can be supported, organized, and argued, don’t try to submit on your own. Don’t let your application become a question mark or headache for the reviewing officer. Hire an experienced immigration attorney to review, prepare, and organize your USCIS submission for increased clarity!

What's the difference between a refugee and an asylee?

By Jessica Suotmaa 0

In popular media the terms ‘refugee’ and ‘asylee’ are often used interchangeably. It’s difficult to tell the difference between seeking refuge and seeking asylum. After all, don’t they mean the same thing?

When it comes to the specific ways the terms apply in immigration, the answer is no.

In this article, we will explain the difference between a refugee, asylee, and asylum seeker.

What’s a Refugee?

Generally, a refugee is someone who has been forced out of their home country. The refugee is seeking refuge outside of their home country because they can no longer remain or return there.

However, in order to receive “refugee status” in the U.S., a refuge seeker must meet certain standards. These standards are dictated by Section 101(a)(42) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and are similar to the international Refugee Status Determination process (RSD).

Here’s what USCIS would require of a potential refuge seeker:

  • Refuge seeker must be outside of the U.S. at the time of application
  • Refuge seeker must’ve been persecuted due to the one of the following:
    • race
    • religion
    • nationality
    • membership in a particular social group
    • political opinion
  • Refuge seeker cannot be settled in another country
  • Refuge seeker must be inadmissible in the U.S. by other means

To apply for refugee status in the U.S., a refuge seeker must be referred to the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for refugee status determination.

What “rights” do Refugees have?

Once refugees are granted “refugee status”, they have certain internationally recognized “rights”. Such rights include:

  • Right to their original property (in their country of origin, should they return)

Note: Voluntary return to a refugee’s country of origin to claim property can result in a loss of their third country residence allowance. So if you’ve been granted stay in a country where you didn’t apply for asylum, you can lose that right to stay when you leave to return to your country of origin.

  • Right not to be deported to their country of origin

Note: Although a refugee cannot be deported to their country of origin (where they were persecuted), they can be relocated to a different country.

  • Right to travel (but not to their country of origin)

Note: Refugees are encouraged to remain in the first country they arrive at instead of shopping for better refugee benefits, or risk losing their refugee status.

Who is NOT a Refugee?

The USCIS website specifies that a person who leaves his home country for a “better life” is not a refugee but an “economic immigrant”.

Also, those who are already in the U.S. seeking refuge for humanitarian reasons such as persecution by race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion must apply through the asylum program.

Who is an Asylum Applicant?

Where a refugee is not granted permission to enter a country until they are approved through the refugee program, an asylum applicant is a person who applies for asylum status while in the country. Therefore, a migrant who feels persecuted can enter American soil or reach the U.S. border and request asylum. But, the key difference is that a refugee has been granted asylum before they entered the U.S. and an asylum seeker is claiming they are a refugee but is still waiting for the results of his or her application.

In most countries, asylum applicants do not have the same rights as refugees. They are not granted work permits, benefits, or the freedom to move freely within the country.  Asylum applicants must prove their case before they can become “asylees”.

Who is an Asylee?

An asylee is an asylum applicant who has been granted refugee status or “asylum”.

 

Do you have questions regarding your asylum qualifications or application? Contact our experienced asylum attorneys about the best way to present your application or most credible deportation defense case strategy!

5 Things to Know About Sessions' Recent Asylum Decision re: Domestic and Gang Violence

By Jessica Suotmaa 0

We have been carefully following Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions’ review of the domestic violence asylum case (Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 338 (BIA 2014)), which he overturned on June 11, 2018.  While our previous post on Sessions’ asylum decision was rather detailed, this post will outline the top five things you need to know from his decision.

  1. “Particular Social Group” category definition

Sessions states that persecution is usually government persecution, and while he did not define exactly what the catch-all “particular social group” includes, he does list all the boxes the particular case did not check.

The particular social group must…

  1. …be widely “understood to be a societal faction or a recognized segment of the population” in the applicant’s home country.
  2. …have members who share a “common immutable characteristic”, such as one “that either is beyond the power of an individual to change or is so fundamental to individual identity or conscience that it ought not be required to be changed.”
  3. …not be too wide in definition, such as “married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship”.
  4. …not be too narrow in definition, such as “El Salvadoran women who are unable to leave their domestic relationships where they have children in common”.
  5. …not be helped by the government (when not directly persecuted by the government).
  6. …must be the primary cause for asylum.

In the case of gang violence, Sessions explains how immigration judges have previously determined that victims of gang violence are not a “particular social group” but come from “all segments of society” and cannot be grouped together. So while it seems that gang members are a social group, victims of gang members are unfortunately not.

  1. Burden of Proof

Sessions highlights that the “burden of proof” lays with the applicant, meaning the applicant must show enough evidence to prove her need for asylum. The evidence must meet all the elements for asylum, which is determined by the asylum officer, immigration judge, or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

An example of bearing the burden of proof is by proving “group membership”. An applicant is expected to know the origins of the particular social group and be able to describe her membership.

  1. Credibility

Sessions has stated that if an applicant’s asylum claim is “fatally flawed in one respect, [then] immigration officers and judges need not examine the remaining elements of the asylum claim”. This basically means the applicant’s story must add up and be fool proof. If there are any question marks that constitute a “flaw” in reasoning, then the asylum application can be instantly denied without further review.

Applicants may notice the results of this decision at Immigration when observing asylum interviews that last mere minutes.

  1. Government’s Responsibility

To qualify for asylum, the applicant must prove that her government is unable or unwilling to protect her. However, if the government has made efforts but “may have problems effectively policing certain crimes”, then that reason alone is not enough to meet asylum requirements. Similarly, if “certain populations are more likely to be victims of crime”, then it is also not enough to qualify.

In the above case of domestic violence, Sessions states that for the applicant to show that the government doesn’t control private behavior well, e.g., the police don’t respond to 911 calls, is not enough. Rather, the applicant must prove that the government is not only aware of the private behavior, but also allows it to occur. If the case is that the government cannot protect the applicant, then the applicant must show evidence of the government’s inability to protect victims like her.

“The fact that the local police have not acted on a particular report of an individual crime does not necessarily mean that the government is unwilling or unable to control crime, any more than it would in the United States. There may be many reasons why a particular crime is not successfully investigated and prosecuted. Applicants must show not just that the crime has gone unpunished, but that the government is unwilling or unable to prevent it.”

  1. Scope

Finally, Sessions reminds that applicants not only have to prove all of the above and any other requirements, but also has to provide evidence as to why escape to the United States is their only option.

“When the applicant has suffered personal harm at the hands of only a few specific individuals, internal relocation would seem more reasonable than if the applicant were persecuted, broadly, by her country’s government.”

 

If you have any questions about how Sessions’ decision reversal may affect your application for asylum or immigration hearing, contact us today to talk to an experienced immigration attorney!

Choose someone professional

By Justin Lum 3

IMMIGRATION – ASYLUM APPEAL
Recently I appeared before the Ninth Circuit for oral argument on a immigration appeal where my client was originally granted asylum, but the case was reopened on a motion by the government and subsequently the trial court found he had filed a frivolous asylum application but still granted him withholding of removal. After appeals by both my client and the government, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the frivolous asylum filing but overturned the withholding of removal grant, which led us to the Ninth Circuit. Right now it is uncertain how the Ninth Circuit will rule. But the main lessons from this case? Use a competent immigration attorney to prepare your immigration documents and know what is in your document before you sign it.

In the situation above, the problem was that when my client first decided to apply for asylum, he didn’t know anyone, so he was referred to a “service” that helped prepare asylum applications. My client provided a statement, but the company decided to alter it and then told him he had to abide by the altered statement or else. My client, a new immigrant, was terrified and didn’t know to whom to turn, and thus, from fear, did what he was told to do.

In the end, the principals of that “service” went to jail for a some years, and my client…faces a lifetime ban on living in the United States with his U.S. citizen wife and U.S. born child. All this because he relied on a “service” that skirted the laws and didn’t really care about the effects on those it was supposedly there to help.

And that is why for any immigration issues you need to use a competent immigration attorney. The attorney has his own license and reputation to worry about. Because of that he is going to honest and open with you and do what is necessary for your case, without putting you in a position where they can lose everything, as happened in this.

In the end the victim of persecution has become a victim of those who are supposed to be helping him, possibly preventing him from even finding any legal alternative to obtaining lawful status in the United States.

在第九巡回法庭展开一场关于移民诉讼的辩论，我的一名客户原本获得了庇护，但政府和预审法庭后来发现他填写的庇护申请过于草率时请求重新审理案件，但依然给予了暂缓递解。后来客户和政府进行了多轮申诉。移民委员会上诉证实了草率庇护，取消了暂缓递解。因此我们只能寻求第九巡回法庭。现在不确定第九巡回法庭会如何判定。但我们可以从这个案件中认识到，找一个有能力的移民律师来帮助准备你的移民文件，让你在签下这些文件前知道这些文件是干什么的。

在上面的情况中，问题出在当客户决定申请庇护时，他不认识任何人可以估这件事，因此他找了一个可以帮助他准备庇护申请的服务机构。客户提供材料，但这家服务公司决定篡改材料，然后告诉他必须承受篡改文件的后果。我的客户是一名新移民，听到这些就吓坏了，也不知道可以向谁寻求帮助，别人叫他做什么他就做什么。

最后，这家服务机构的负责人坐牢去了，同时我的客户面临着在美国终身监禁，他和他的美国妻子已经生了孩子。所有这些都是因为他找到的这家服务机构在跟法律打擦边球，而且不真的关心那些可能会产生什么后果。

这就是为什么任何移民都应该找一个有能力的移民律师。并且应该关心律师是否有自己的执照和声誉。因这样的律师才会诚实做事，全力帮助你做你关心的事，不会将你置于他们可能会失败的情况中。

最后这名受迫害的人已经成了他曾寻求帮助的人的受害者，可能阻碍他在美国寻求法律途径获得合法身份。